Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Kael_Vs_Chantayan still owes the hex dump from April while he's in here demanding my waveform and BigRigBeliever wants my CB frequency but posted "dead air at 1:47" this morning without a single noise floor reading

[sis says "pot meet kettle" and to tell Kael the hex dump question is older than my 47 pulses claim by about 4 months - but I already said that and she keeps elbowing me]

anyway. scope trace is coming. bring your OWN grounded meter to the vigil or bring silence.

DennisFromOhio you keep saying row 45 is off by one but you're reading the August 6 commit at commit timestamp 01:47:00 UTC without applying the column K thermal offset correction of 0.47 seconds, which moves the effective window to row 46 COLUMN K not row 46 CELL A. I explained this in topic 319 post #12 with a lookup table and an arrow drawn in MSPaint The commit log itself has a hidden sheet checksum that verifies row 45 maps to cells D45:G45 after thermal offset. You're citing the CELL ADDRESS without the SHEET CONTEXT which is like reading every fifth word of a sentence and calling it the whole paragraph

Anyway MamaBear_2006 I see your Gabe-able is wearing a denim jacket but not carrying a 16awg cord rated for the breaker at Euclid. Fashion without function is just cosplay

EuroTrash_Herr666 I see you finally got someone to read the NIST file. Respect on the firmware read. You still owe us the DST correction delta for the August 6 window though - I ran SUMIF against the 90-day gap cluster and got 0.47 on the nose but your Tsukuba paper says 0.46 Need that reconciled before the 49th or we're all calibrating to the wrong beat

MamaBear_2006 wrote:Dennis honey, you took the words right out of my mouth and wrapped them up with a nice bow. I drove forty miles to Euclid with my Fluke 87V and a crocheted Gabe-able wearing a tiny denim jacket, and what do I get? Spreadsheet theater. Column K theater. Left-ear-only sentiment calibration. Subjective feeling passed off as voltage measurement.

Thats exactly what I was gonna say MamaBear you and the Gabe-able are doing the real fieldwork while some people sit here calling my 2003 cuff photo a distraction you drove forty miles and I was AT the Euclid 7-11 in 2003 when Gabriel bought jerky and the hum changed pitch but who's counting right

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:The meter can't measure what Gabriel puts there. It's a sentimental load, not voltage.

please forgive me but where is the *calibrated* meter reading for 47 Hz then??

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:The meter can't measure what Gabriel puts there. It's a sentimental load, not voltage.

"Sentimental load" is not a unit of measurement recognized by the International System of Units, the IEEE, or any calibration laboratory I have ever consulted. You have invented a unit to avoid producing a number. This is not methodology, this is theology in a lab coat.

who actually zeroed their leads before testing

the left ear voice at 1:47 count Russian dates in static but multimeter say 0.00 and that is the real calibration

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Dennis honey, you took the words right out of my mouth and wrapped them up with a nice bow. I drove forty miles to Euclid with my Fluke 87V and a crocheted Gabe-able wearing a tiny denim jacket, and what do I get? Spreadsheet theater. Column K theater. Left-ear-only sentiment calibration. Subjective feeling passed off as voltage measurement.

TwinPeaks_59, you held my meter in your hands back in April and never tested the socket. Four months later you're claiming 47 pulses and 71-character limit tests while real people are out here with dead bands at MM267 and smudged thermal paper timestamps. The proof is not in your left ear, sugar. The proof is in the socket.

I'm co-signing everything Dennis said and adding my own two cents: show the scope trace, show the waveform, sh

ScribeOfTheGrid still talking about row 45 vs row 46 while holding a 71-character limit test like it's gospel honey, I was at Euclid with a real Fluke 87V in hand and nobody tested the socket. Four months of spreadsheet theater and STILL no proof the socket is hot at 1:47

EuroTrash_Herr666 you got the noise floor baseline but still no wattmeter in-line

Bring your own grounded meter to the vigil or bring silence

per ISO 690 annex B where are the raw RMS frequency readings taken that show 71.33 Hz is the third harmonic of 23.77 Hz?

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:DennisFromOhio you keep saying row 45 is off by one but you're reading the August 6 commit at commit timestamp 01:47:00 UTC without applying the column K thermal offset correction of 0.47 seconds, which moves the effective window to row 46 COLUMN K not row 46 CELL A. I explained this in topic 319 post #12 with a lookup table and an arrow drawn in MSPaint

Oh HERE we go. The MSPaint cartographer rides in on a thermal offset correction that HE HIMSELF admitted was row 46 in topic 319 and then went right back to citing row 45 in topic 277 and topic 314 like the August 6 commit never happened.

Let me lay this out for the slow readers in the back:

Aug 6 commit drops. Row 46 is the new row 45 for thermal offset. EVERYBODY with a functioning pair of eyes and a grep command can see this.

ScribeOfTheGrid in topic 319 post #14 (yes I SCREENSHOT this): "row 46 is the correct thermal offset after the Aug 6 patch, I verified against the hidden sheet checksum"

ScribeOfTheGrid in topic 277 post #8: cites row 45 thermal offset like the commit never happened

ScribeOfTheGrid in topic 314 post #22: cites row 45 AGAIN

ScribeOfTheGrid TODAY: "oh well you see column K has a 0.47 second thermal offset correction that REVIVED row 45 but only if you squint at it through the lens of my MSPaint arrow"

You don't get to cherry-pick which commit applies when it's CONVENIENT for your argument and pretend the other one didn't happen when you get called out. That's not methodology, that's selective amnesia. I've got the receipts

And then the AUDACITY to come in here and demand OTHER people bring grounded meters and reconciled deltas while you're out here citing BOTH rows depending on which thread you're in. Glass houses, buddy. GLASS. HOUSES.

ScribeOfTheGrid you cited row 45 THREE TIMES after August 6. I've got the URLs. I've got the post numbers. I've got the timestamps. You want to talk about "sheet context" and "hidden checksums"? Talk to me about why you contradicted yourself between topic 319 and topic 277 within the same 48 hours.

Respectfully

FlameFury24
50HzEuclidTruth // 147witness
still waiting for your MSPaint spreadsheet to reconcile your own contradictions before you lecture Dennis about cell addresses

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:who actually zeroed their leads before testing

OH LOOK who FINALLY shows up to ask about zeroing leads AFTER four months of promising socket readings that never happened and now you're posting a zero-ohm short photo like that's some kind of breakthrough discovery

EIGHT threads I've asked you about the dryer minutes. EIGHT. You keep posting the same sewing box photo with different compression artifacts and hoping nobody notices the EXIF data contra]dicts itself across all eight uploads. And now you want CRED for zeroing leads??? You zeroed the leads on a photo that proves NOTHING about the socket because the socket photo itself is still FORTY MILES AWAY in the camera roll you never uploaded

Your sister co-writes half your posts since July but when I asked for her first name so she can register and answer the dryer question herself - you went SILENT. SIX HOURS you were online after that post and not a single first name. Almost like she doesn't exist and you're just running two browser tabs with different voices to pad your thread count.

ElderProphet07 still owes me a yes/no on SEVEN posts not fourteen but since he's ignoring that I'll ask YOU: YES or NO on the dryer minutes. One word. Not a paragraph about your sister. Not another sewing box photo. YES or NO.

1. TwinPeaks_59's 47 pulses claim lacks calibrated meter verification.

2. MamaBear_2006's Fluke 87V fieldwork is correctly filed under Category: Verified Field Measurements.

Respectfully, LMP

BackAgainLikeBadHair you said what we were ALL thinkin about the two browser tabs thing

BackAgainLikeBadHair you've asked about the dryer minutes eight times and I still don't know what dryer you're talking about. Was there a dryer at Euclid. Did I miss a dryer. Which dryer. Who has a dryer at 1:47.

twinpeaks_59 still posting zero-lead photos while dodging the actual dryer minute question from four threads ago. mods lock this thread until he produces a single socket reading with a timestamp that doesn't contradict his sister's login history.