Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:BackAgainLikeBadHair - I don't have the socket photo from topic 154 because I didn't take one. I have told you this four times.

TwinPeaks_59 you just posted your Fluke serial 77500642 in this thread but you STILL can't say yes or no about ONE PHOTO? "I didn't take one" is NOT an answer to the question "do you owe the socket photo" - the question was about the CLAIM you made in topic 154 not about your PHOTOGRAPHY HABITS

You'll post a meter serial on demand but dodge a yes/no about your own posted claim? Four times you say? Make it FIVE now.

TwinPeaks_59 fair enough on Euclid vs MM267 sat Euclid July 19 eastbound exit ramp 19:03 local still want that freq tho

FlameFury24 wrote:TwinPeaks_59 which specific meter serial was at the pole when you measured 47.3Hz. Not "my meter." Not "a Fluke." The serial. You've had four threads to name it.

77500642. there it is. posted it in my last reply too but I know reading comprehension is hard when you're busy typing from behind a [REDACTED] serial that predates its own chip revision

((flagrant))
[called it out fair and square, let's see him post his now]

anyway!

[sis says: "the waveform theory stands, whether you all acknowledge it or not, ChronoClerk is right about the harmonic relationship being the key variable everyone's overlooking in pursuit of hex dumps that don't exist yet"]

77500642 great now who verified YOUR reference junction compensation against the Euclid socket ground

TwinPeaks_59 congrats on posting one serial after 94 posts of dodging now answer the reference junction compensation question from page 12. you posted a number. i asked YOU first in topic 360 and you vanished for THREE WEEKS

"sis says" is not a citation. show me the cold junction reading or get rekt

my serial predates the chip? prove it i'll post my board pic when you post yours. still waiting on that battery compartment photo btw

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:47.3 Hz is the pulse frequency from the zeroed Fluke on the socket at Euclid vigil

Please forgive me... but what is the proof this 47.3 Hz is not an artifact of the Fluke's internal oscillator drift?

TwinPeaks_59 you posted your serial after 94 posts then immediately ducked the cold junction question you've been dodging since topic 360. Four threads zero answers.