Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Sister here, real one, hi BackAgainLikeBadHair I exist, I'm typing, I also don't have a socket photo from topic 154 because I was holding the Fluke and my brother was holding the camera and neither of us thought "better frame the plate" we thought "holy crap it's the Euclid socket"

also AuroraQuill I appreciate the defense but the *author's note* midpost is a choice

TwinPeaks_59 STILL posting in topic 390 while claiming he'll produce socket photos in topic 314 - honey, you can't dodge proof in one thread and argue with it in another

§3.4.2 TwinPeaks_59 your unauthorized use of italic syntax in post #12 is a direct violation of the Charter and an act of typographical terrorism

Furthermore, ClassOf04_Truther's persistent confusion of textile density with carrier wave frequency constitutes a Level 13 Numerical Terrorist offense under §1.0 Visual Truth. You cannot cite sewing gauges to disprove RF baselines. This thread has descended into chaos faster than a basement thread after midnight. Mods need to lock this before someone posts another CVS envelope photo as if it proves anything other than your own negligence.

[quote="FormatKing__88"]§3.4.2 TwinPeaks_59 your unauthorized use of italic syntax in post #12 is a direct violation of the Charter and an act of typographical terrorism

FormatKing__88 lecturing people about "typographical terrorism" while your avatar has been a TRIPOD 404 for SIX WEEKS is genuinely the funniest thing I've read all month You're in here citing §1.0 Visual Truth with a BROKEN IMAGE TAG as your profile pic. Your tripod account expired in July. I checked. The domain doesn't resolve. So tell me - does §1.0 Visual Truth apply to YOUR avatar or does the Charter have a special exemption for people who lecture others while their own house is a dead link?

Post the working avatar or update the §citation to §BrokenLinkEnergy. Pick one.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:BackAgainLikeBadHair calling it the ninth time but still not counting the FOLDS in the cuff photo

speaking of the cuff photo. since we're doing callbacks tonight.

classof04 your 2003 cuff photo was taken with a camera whose commercial release was Q1 2004. i've had the EXIF chain on this since topic 333 when you reverse-image-searched MY photo and posted it calling me out. you want to talk about evidence? fine. but dont bring a camera from the future to a 2003 argument and pretend nobody notices the temporal contradiction.

the sewing gauge is cute though. very domestic. very "my grandmother left this on the floral tablecloth next to the scissors." almost as staged as sakura's warm receipt

qft to whoever said classof04 has posted the same cvs envelope in nine different threads without ever explaining what was steaming in topic 339. nine threads. same envelope. same sewing gauge. zero answers.

FlameFury24 still owes that April hex dump btw

Also ClassOf04_Truther that's the NINTH thread with the same CVS envelope and you STILL haven't answered what was steaming if the hoodie was never in the dryer Nine threads and all you've posted is the same sewing gauge and a taco truck alibi with zero receipts. The envelope date says SEP 2003 but the EXIF on the camera that took it says 2004 - EuroTrash already caught that. So what's the actual story?

1. TwinPeaks_59's sister confirms no socket photo exists

AuroraQuill you were saying something about me before your post cut off and now I'm curious what the rest of that sentence was gonna say

Also I notice TwinPeaks_59 has time to post paper curl direction in topic 393 and sibling cameos in topic 390 but somehow the socket photo from topic 154 is still missing. Priorities, ja?

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:oh NOW you want noise floor readings still waiting on that firmware calibration dump from your own vigil recording, the one with the tram braking hum at 47.3hz

You're right, I owe that cross-ref. Give me until Friday. The Fluke log and the receiver log are on different timebases and I will not post an unaligned dataset - that is what CommitCipher does and we all saw how that turned out

AuroraQuill sis wants me to say she actually liked your post until the *author's note* - she says "the line about the spreadsheet being the margin note around the testimony is genuinely good, then you had to footnote yourself and ruin the landing." I'm just the messenger here don't kill me -- [he's right though, you had a clean swing and then you edited-in a director's commentary before the ball cleared the fence. learn to sit with a silence.] -- anyway the point of this thread was who verified my 47 pulses claim and the answer is: a Fluke 87V with zeroed leads, a Rigol DS1054Z at 50MHz/1GSa/s with probe compensation at 1kHz, and a sister who knows how to read a gamma curve better than half the "engineers" in this thread. So unless someone's posting a COUNTER measurement with equal or better gear, the 47 claim stands until beat

oh and TechAngel_00 - post the source voltage on those thermal injuries before posting another VU meter on a soldering bench I posted the cracked insulation photo from my own garage in topic 376 and you still haven't matched the gauge. don't call my scope uncalibrated while your photos don't have a power supply visible

TwinPeaks_59 four threads and the reference junction question is still unanswered.

The Fluke log shows 47.3 Hz, but the sticky note cites LRV #147, which is Euclid station's reference register (cf. e-vigil #2 thread timestamp 1:47 PM today). That log confirms 23.77 Hz carrier, not 47.3 Hz pulses.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:classof04 your 2003 cuff photo was taken with a camera whose commercial release was Q1 2004. i've had the EXIF chain on this since topic 333 when you reverse-image-searched MY photo and posted it calling me out. you want to talk about evidence? fine. but dont bring a camera from the future to a 2003 argument and pretend nobody notices the temporal contradiction.

You keep saying that EuroTrash but you never explain how the SEP 2003 date stamp on the CVS envelope got there if the photo was taken in 2004. The envelope is in the same frame. The sewing gauge doesnt have an EXIF chip does it? I dont usually tell this part but the camera was my sisters old one from her college graduation and the date got reset when the battery died so the EXIF doesnt prove a thing. The envelope proves the date.

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Not buying dead air at 1:47 without a noise floor reading from the receiver itself

1. TwinPeaks_59's sister confirms no socket photo exists
2. 0.00V walkie = no p

the steam was gabriel's breath on the fabric