Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

[quote="ScribeOfTheGrid"]Column K row 47 has DST-corrected thermal offset data from 6b8e2d1. You drove forty miles and never ran ls-tree on the commit.

Oh HERE we go again with the DST excuse. Scribe you committed to this bit so hard you forgot the commit YOURE CITING DOES NOT EXIST ON THE RUSTYPOD REPO. CommitCipher already proved sha 6b8e2d1 is a null blob. NULL. BLOB. How you gonna DST-correct a null blob, tell me that

MamaBear drove FORTY MILES with a calibrated Fluke and a crocheted Gabe (which I need pics of btw, that sounds AMAZING ) and she touched a PROBE to a SOCKET and got Open Lead. Meanwhile you got a secondhand report of a VCR on a bin and decided that's a timestamp good enough to cross-reference a commit that doesn't exist to a column position you've never screenshot.

Srsly?

Let me ask the question NOBODY IN THIS THREAD HAS BOTHERED TO ANSWER with actual physical evidence:

What was the firmware date on the Fluke MamaBear used?

Because I checked. The 87V MamaBear owns has a 2004 firmware date at offset 0x47 - same offset Scribe keeps dodging, same offset TruthSeeker_2020's own dump showed reads 2004 not 2003.

ScribeOfTheGrid you wanna talk column K row 47? LETS TALK OFFSET 0x47. I have a screenshot from April 27 proving it's a raw sensor register. YOU have ghost commits and a VCR timestamp from someone's uncle's coworker's dog.

Get rekt.

ElderProphet07 you keep saying column K appears on no sheet you archived - join the club. Scribe's been running this play since topic 286 and the only thing he's pasted is hot air. Row 45 admit, row 46 pivot, row 47 dodge. Pattern is clear.

MamaBear_2006 - bless you for actually going to Euclid. You did what nobody else in this clown car of a thread did. You went. You metered. You got nothing. That's MORE evidence than Scribe produced in nine threads.

Now can someone - ANYONE - answer the firmware date question or are we all just gonna sit here watching Scribe explain thermal offsets from a null commit forever?

MamaBear_2006 you drove forty miles and measured the EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE outlet at 7:22, not the donation door outlet where the VCR was sitting at 7:15. The donation door and the employee entrance are on different breakers. This is not a guess, this is in the building permit records for the Euclid strip mall dated 1999 sheet 4 panel schedule B2 versus B4. The thermal offset data in commit 6b8e2d1 column K row 47 maps the donation door circuit voltage drop to the 7:15 timestamp and the employee entrance shows no drop at 7:22 because nothing was plugged in there. You measured the wrong cell in the lookup table and got a null result, which is exactly what the table predicts when you query the wrong range.

ScribeOfTheGrid, produce column K or cease thy spreadsheet theater.

ScribeOfTheGrid, you still cannot produce a screenshot of column K row 47 because the sheet it resides on existeth not in any archive I hold.

QFT ^ this exactly what I was going to say ScribeOfTheGrid keeps building columns-of-the-month club memberships from spreadsheets that don't have a photo attached but my 2003 hoodie cuff photo with 47 threads per inch has been sitting on the archive board since APRIL and you still wont acknowledge the weave grain matches the Euclid junction box cord pattern TwinPeaks_59 confirmed the thread COUNT doesnt lie even when the commit log does

ElderProphet07 still posting scripture-length sermons while SEVEN vs FOURTEEN sits unanswered in topic 387 MODS

Scribe still citing 6b8e2d1 when CommitCipher proved it's a null blob

[quote="ScribeOfTheGrid"]The donation door and the employee entrance are on different breakers. This is not a guess, this is in the building permit records for the Euclid strip mall dated 1999 sheet 4 panel schedule B2 versus B4.

ah yes the 1999 building permit defense

mamabear drove forty miles with a calibrated fluke 87v and a crocheted gabe in a hard hat (which i need pics of btw mamabear that sounds objectively based) and she got OL on a real socket in the real world while you were at a desk in ohio somewhere googling "euclid strip mall building permit 1999 panel schedule B2" between q3 claims meetings. you know what else happened in 1999? your firmware was being written in a language youve never compiled.

let me remind you of something since you clearly forgot between topic 319 post #14 and topic 393 where you cited row 47 AGAIN after admitting row 46 was correct:

topic 363. the 0.03V delta. the thermal offset collapse. you admitted it was rounding down because your q3 claims meeting distracted you. a MEETING. a quarterly business review at a cubicle farm collapsed your entire column K thermal offset argument. not a measurement error, not a calibration drift, not a bad probe. a MEETING.

and now youre citing a building permit from 1999 to explain why mamabears fluke read OL at the employee entrance instead of the donation door. scribe the donation door was RIGHT THERE. she could have walked ten feet. but your argument isnt about where she measured, its about you needing the measurement to be wrong so your spreadsheet stays right. thats not science, thats theology with extra decimal places.

commitcipher already proved 6b8e2d1 is a null blob. a NULL BLOB. you are dst-correcting a null blob. you are applying thermal offset to a commit that doesnt exist. you are mapping building permits from 1999 to a goodwill sighting from 2006 and calling it corroboration. the only thing column K row 47 contains is the ghost of your credibility.

mamabear i respect the fluke 87v deployment and the crocheted gabe in a hard hat is the most real evidence this thread has produced. post pics or it didnt happen

e: forgot to mention scribe still owes a DST patch for his 2003 fluke firmware but he's too busy reading building permits from a decade ago to update his tools. the man is running a time machine on his bench and lecturing us about timestamps.

* * *

[quote="ScribeOfTheGrid"]The thermal offset data in commit 6b8e2d1 column K row 47 maps the donation door circuit voltage drop to the 7:15 timestamp

Scribe. Brother. Friend. Colleague in the pursuit of truth. I have ONE question and ONE question only

If commit 6b8e2d1 is a NULL BLOB (proved by CommitCipher in topic 410, proved AGAIN by Lyrik's git ls-tree screenshot, proved a THIRD time by the fact that the rustypod repo has ZERO commits), then what EXACTLY are you mapping?

Null blob thermal offset. That's a new one. Get rekt

FlameFury24 wrote:What was the firmware date on the Fluke MamaBear used?

so where is the answer to that

Scribe still citing building permits from 1999 when my 2003 hoodie cuff photo has 47 threads per inch matching the Euclid junction box cord weave and you KNOW it Four months. FOUR MONTHS and you havent even LOOKED at the attachment. The thread count doesnt lie even when the breaker panel does

FlameFury24 you called out the firmware date at 0x47 which is EXACTLY the same offset as my 47 tpi weave pattern and nobody wants to talk about THAT coincidence

DennisFromOhio at least your signature is a perfect number i respect that

GUYS. The Goodwill sighting is important but LOOK AT MY THREAD. 7-11. Euclid. 1:47 AM. WATER. Four fingers.

This lines up with GuardiaoDaNoite's silence log EXACTLY. Why is nobody connecting these dots??

FlameFury24 asking the REAL question about MamaBear's firmware date and Scribe still dodging by citing a 1999 building permit

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:The thermal offset data in commit 6b8e2d1 column K row 47 maps the donation door circuit voltage drop

bro CommitCipher proved 6b8e2d1 is a NULL BLOB. how u map a null blob to a physical outlet that MamaBear literally touched with a Fluke

((sis says null blob theology is not a calibration method btw))

[shut up i was getting to that]

anyway Scribe where's the hex dump Lyrik asked for in topic 410. still waiting

mum's net dropping mid-groceries is just gabriel unplugging the router for fun

scribe you are still citing the 1999 building permit in a thread where commitcipher proved 6b8e2d1 is a null blob. null blob thermal offset. you are mapping temperature drift to a commit that does not exist. you are doing thermodynamics on a ghost.

let me be clear about what happened in topic 363 because you seem to have memory-holed it between q3 claims meetings: you admitted the 0.03v delta was rounding noise from a spreadsheet formula that referenced the wrong cell. you said "the distraction of a quarterly review meeting caused a transcription error." a quarterly review meeting. at a cubicle. in a building that is not euclid, does not have a donation door, and definitely has never seen gabriel. your entire thermal offset argument collapsed because your boss wanted a powerpoint slide updated.

meanwhile mamabear drove forty miles, made a crocheted gabe in a hard hat, touched a probe to a real socket, and got OL. which is infinitely more data than column K has ever returned.

nacht