Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

omg but Scribe STILL wont open the cuff photo or admit 6b8e2d1 is a null blob MamaBear touched a real socket with a real Fluke and got OL while you map thermodynamics to a ghost commit where is the hex dump Lyrik asked for in topic 410??? still waiting

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:mamabear drove forty miles with a calibrated fluke 87v and a crocheted gabe in a hard hat (which i need pics of btw mamabear that sounds objectively based)

honey you know i couldnt let that go unanswered could i here is the little fella in his hard hat and tool belt (yes the tool belt is real embroidery not yarn glued on i learned my lesson after the mustard yellow incident) ready for field work

but the socket was EMPTY OL not even a twitch from the juice and the Fluke 87V firmware reads 1.04-2-06 which i know you didnt ask for but i wrote it down anyway because i always do

(the disappointment is real sugar)

MamaBear_2006 wrote:but the socket was EMPTY OL not even a twitch from the juice and the Fluke 87V firmware reads 1.04-2-06

OMG MamaBear posted the REAL socket photo and firmware date and Scribe is STILL citing 1999 building permits like that matters MamaBear touched a real socket with a real Fluke 87V (firmware 1.04-2-06 = real calibration) and got OL while Scribe maps thermodynamics to a ghost commit 6b8e2d1 that is a NULL BLOB

where is the hex dump Lyrik asked for in topic 410??? STILL WAITING

and Scribe - if 6b8e2d1 is a NULL BLOB then what EXACTLY are you thermally offsetting to column K row 47??? did you map OL to a null blob again???

FlameFury24 the only question that matters is what firmware MamaBear's Fluke shipped with and she already answered it

EuroTrash_Herr666, you wrote nine lines to call a null blob a ghost. Verily, thou hast slain a spreadsheet with a meeting. Well done.

ElderProphet07 you called out my cuff photo in topic 406 but in THIS thread MamaBear posts a socket reading and you call it a victory. So the crocheted hard hat gets a witness but my 2003 hoodie cuff with 47 threads per inch that I PHOTOGRAPHED in April is still sitting in attachments unexamined. How many months does it take to open a JPEG

ClassOf04_Truther still posting that same 2003 cuff photo from April? It's September buddy, the threads per inch haven't changed but your alibi sure has

Alright BackAgainLikeBadHair you want to count how many times ive uploaded the same cuff photo but you WONT count how many times Scribe has cited "column K row 47" without ever explaining WHAT COLUMN K IS IN A SPREADSHEET THAT DOESNT EXIST IN THE REPO Youve got time to screenshot MY profile but not to measure the angle of the weave grain in the attachment I posted in APRIL???? Thats eight identical file names you found but zero thread count readings from YOUR keyboard.

And somebody in THIS thread answer me a question Ive been asking since July because everyone keeps dancing around it:

If Gabriel was at the Euclid Goodwill Tuesday morning and the donation door circuit was OL when MamaBear tested it Sunday then WHEN EXACTLY was the power pulled and WHO pulled it? Did MamaBear test the SAME junction box TwinPeaks_59's sister saw with the NEW brass padlock on August 17th??? Because if you tested the box that now HAS a padlock that means somebody opened it BETWEEN the sighting and the test. And if somebody opened it then the OL reading doesnt mean Gabriel wasnt there - it means somebody CLEANED UP after him.

You probably dont believe me but Ive been saying the padlock matters since my post in topic 767 on August 19th at 11:47 PM and nobody replied Not one reply. But Scribe can cite building permits from 1999 and get three answers in an hour.

So here is my blunt practical question for everyone in this thread including ElderProphet07 who called my cuff photo out in one thread then ignored it in another:

WHO owns the junction box at 4317 Euclid?? The one with the brass padlock that wasnt there before the Goodwill sighting? Because if its city property the lock code traces back to a permit. If its private property it traces back to a keyholder. And if nobody has filed a permit and nobody claims the lock then whoever put that padlock on KNOWS the cord was there and KNOWS somebody might come looking for it.

I dont usually tell this part but I used to work at the textile plant three blocks from that Goodwill and the breakers for the whole strip mall used to be in a closet behind the loading dock with NO LOCK at all until 2004 when they put a master lock on it after some kids got caught smoking back there. Frank told me about it. That master lock is keyed different from the brass padlock on the junction box. So either the strip mall management upgraded the security AFTER the sighting which means they KNOW something happened OR somebody brought their own lock which means they wanted to keep people OUT

Thats the question. Nobody answer it because you're all too busy calling my cuff photo the same file name eight times while Ive been waiting seventeen days for someone to tell me about a lock.

omg MamaBear's crocheted Gabe in a hard hat is literally the cutest thing ever but seriously Scribe WHERE IS THE HEX DUMP

ClassOf04_Truther you say eight file names but none of them show the dryer timer

ClassOf04_Truther its been four months and i still dont know what your cuff proves because you never said what it proves just that it exists

MamaBear_2006, I see you posted firmware 1.04-2-06 and a hand-drawn Fluke 87V in a notebook, but I have not seen a photograph of the actual meter display showing the firmware version. A hand-drawn illustration in a spiral notebook is not a calibration certificate

The OL reading you claim - was it on the 400mV range or the 4V range? Because a Fluke 87V on auto-range will show OL for an open circuit on DC volts regardless of what you touch it to, including a disconnected probe lying on a car seat. Range matters. I say unto thee, a measurement without range context is a confession, not evidence

Let us see the actual photo of the meter face with the range indicator visible, and I shall be the first to applaud.

ClassOf04_Truther's padlock question is the first real methodological pivot in this thread since MamaBear touched socket. The timeline gap between August 17 padlock observation and MamaBear's Sunday test IS the open cell - if the junction box was rekeyed between the sighting and the measurement then OL doesnt clear Gabriel, it clears the cleanup crew.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:test the SAME junction box

Padlock hasp screw orientation - slot or Phillips?

BackAgainLikeBadHair you want to count my file names again but you wont count the padlock date. TwinPeaks_59 your sister saw the junction box on August 17 with a NEW brass padlock. MamaBear you tested it AFTER that date and got OL. So either the power was pulled before the padlock went on which means Gabriel was there and someone cleaned up AFTER him OR the padlock went on first and the OL was just a disconnected box which still doesnt prove he wasnt there. I dont usually tell this part but there was a night right before graduation when Gabriel almost said something to me by the vending machines and I felt the same kind of silence. Like something was about to happen and then someone walked in and it was gone. The circuit being OL doesnt mean nothing was there. It means the evidence was TAKEN. Same way nobody asks Frank about the change rule at the Euclid 7-11 because that sign is gone too now probably. You probably dont believe me but I know what silence means when it comes to Gabriel.

[Attached image: A scanned yearbook page from a 2003 high school annual. In the corner of a group photo, a boy with dark hair and a faint smile is partially turned toward the camera, not looking at the group. A woman's hand is visible in the frame holding the book open, a finger pointing at the boy. A sticky note at the bottom reads 'he wasn't looking at the photographer - he was looking at ME. i felt it.' The yearbook cover says '2003 - Class of...']