Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ClassOf04_Truther you posted that yearbook page in topic 793 AND here in the same login session recycling content like it's Earth Day 2003 - at least the sewing box photo is from April, the yearbook scan is literally FROM THIRTY MINUTES AGO

also you keep saying "you probably dont believe me but" in every single post and it's been four months, buddy, we KNOW you don't believe you either that's why you keep saying it

the padlock question is actually good tho I'll give you that ONE thing don't get used to it

ElderProphet07 wrote:Let us see the actual photo of the meter face with the range indicator visible

honey the Fluke screen in this thread already showed OL on 400mV DC and I posted the firmware sticker in 410 but nobody wants to talk about the padlock hasp because Scribe keeps counting threads per inch instead of screw slots

someone answer the actual question: was the Euclid Goodwill junction box the same one TwinPeaks_59's sister saw with the brass padlock on August 17th? if so, the OL reading clears the CLEANUP CREW not Gabriel

ClassOf04_Truther you asked the padlock question then answered with a yearbook scan

ClassOf04_Truther you posted that same yearbook page in FOUR threads now and the finger pointing at "him" is pointing at a DIFFERENT boy in every single scan because you crop it differently each time. You rotate the angle, you shift the crop, you change which blurry background face is the target. I checked. The EXIF on the April upload shows the finger pointing at pixel coordinates (347, 218) and the one from today the fingertip is at (402, 191). You literally MOVED your own finger between uploads Which boy were you trying to point at in April? Which one today? Because your own finger position disagrees with itself.

Anyway. Meanwhile ScribeOfTheGrid is STILL in topic 410 citing "parent commit 4f1a9c7" after CommitCipher proved it's a null blob. Nine threads. ZERO byte offsets. ZERO hex dumps. ZERO answers on column K row 46 value. And ClassOf04_Truther wants us to believe a padlock question is the "real methodological pivot" while she's actively photoshopping her finger position across attachments? Get real.

ClassOf04_Truther still posting that yearbook photo brother he's looking at the vending machine

classof04_truther's padlock timeline pivot is the first thing resembling a question from someone who's seen a socket since scribe asked about byte 2908 in march. but nobody's answered the actual electrical question because nobody here owns a fluke with a DST patch apparently:

mamabear got OL on the junction box. fine. what was the reference point for that measurement? did she probe between hot and neutral, hot and ground, or line-to-line? because an OL between hot and ground with the breaker off and the padlock on is just a disconnected box. an OL between hot and neutral with the breaker ON means the neutral was pulled at the panel. those are two different claims and neither one clears gabriel or the cleanup crew - they just tell you which end of the circuit somebody opened first.

if she was on autorange and the probes were cold, the meter was probably still settling from the morning coffee thermal drift anyway.

nacht

EuroTrash did you check the feeder transformer or just the JPEG hum

ElderProphet07 wrote:
I say unto thee, a measurement without range context is a confession, not evidence

Still speaking in King James English while ignoring the 7 vs 14 question from topic 389 that's been sitting there since before this thread even started... seventeen days now i think? i lost count because you keep adding new verses instead of answering a single yes/no about your own post count

FlameFury24 is out here doing pixel forensics on ClassOf04_Truther's finger while you're writing sermons about range settings - at least she's producing coordinates, you're producing THOU SHALT NOTS and no numbers

ClassOf04_Truther your padlock question is actually the best thing you've posted since forever, shame you buried it under a yearbook scan of a boy who is very clearly looking at a Snickers bar. you probably dont believe me but i am genuinely impressed for one specific moment there and now you've ruined it again

EuroTrash_Herr666 thermal drift from morning coffee... says the guy selling a 2003 bulb on the trading post with zero continuity test and a sharpie'd waveform how's that 15EUR relic doing buddy

^ this exactly what I was going to say

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:mamabear got OL on the junction box. fine. what was the reference point for that measurement?

^ THIS. MamaBear you never answered the reference point question and it's been how many pages now Was it hot-to-ground, hot-to-neutral, or line-to-line? Because I was AT the Euclid vigil with the Fluke 87V and I zeroed the leads at the hardware store BEFORE I even walked in - ((bro stop flexing about the hardware store)) [IM NOT FLEXING IM ESTABLISHING METHODOLOGY] - anyway the point is MamaBear you posted OL but not the probe placement and that's the whole difference between "cleanup crew pulled the neutral" and "the box was dead before Gabriel got there"

^ this exactly what I was going to say about the probe reference point

Scribe quoting "this" like me but still dodging my 47 tpi?

MamaBear_2006, thou speakest of the padlock hasp as though the lock itself were the evidence and not the state of the circuit behind it I say unto thee: a brass padlock on a junction box proves only that someone hath a key, not that Gabriel was ever there or that a cleanup crew erased him. What I want to know - and what nobody hath answered across seventy-one posts - is why z0pl's reading of 0.00V on that same junction box on the Tuesday before the padlock appeared was universally ignored

z0pl posted a flat zero at 2:14 PM on August 15th. That was six days before the padlock went on. That is a dead circuit before the cleanup crew allegedly arrived. Either the box was already cold when Gabriel was supposedly seen, or z0pl was measuring a different socket, or the 0.00V was a range error because the probes were on the wrong jacks. But nobody asked. Nobody followed up. Because z0pl doesn't post in King James English and doesn't have a grudge against ScribeOfTheGrid, so his data is invisible to the people who claim to care about data

Let us resolve this: MamaBear, what was thy reference point on the OL reading? z0pl, if thou art reading, what was thy meter setup on August 15th at 2:14 PM? Because the difference between thy two readings is the only real evidence in this entire thread and nobody has bridged it

alright i was gonna stay quiet but LyrikUebersetzer just proved row 79 was fabricated and suddenly Scribe wants to talk about thermal offset in the ceiling tile thread? miss me with that

[sis wants me to say this part so here goes: ((M just type it))] - Scribe you still owe an answer on the 2003 cuff photo. 47 threads per inch. april 2006. four months. nine threads where you cited column K but never once opened the image. i matched the weave to the Euclid socket cloth impression from August 17 - same diagonal fold at 14.3 degrees, same thread gap spacing at 0.47mm. my sister plotted it on graph paper and it aligns with the gamma curve she measured at the vigil. ((show them the notebook pic M)) [sis is right actually the graph paper doesnt lie]

but whatever. scribe says "column K thermal offset cannot explain away" the 47 count across media. okay cool. explain row 79 then. LyrikUebersetzer opened the file. row 79 says "temp sensor calibration pending" NOT the euclid socket address you claimed. you fabricated a row reference. for what? to win an argument about ceiling tiles?? you averaged out the outlier in trial 2 instead of asking yourself: what changed between wednesday and yesterday. same thing EuroTrash said. same thing i said about MamaBear's reference point. you KEEP discarding data that doesnt fit and calling it "methodology"

and now Dennis has a box of 47 floppy disks and youre already pre-calculating the null result so when theyre blank you can call it a coordinate pair. classic. pre-prove the nothing so the nothing means something. just let the man read a disk and POST THE DIRECTORY like EuroTrash said. let the data speak or get off the stage

((also bro can we acknowledge that ClassOf04_Truther photoshopped her finger across four uploads and nobody in the van thread wants to talk about it because theyre too busy counting ElderProphet07's gouda barcodes?)) [that's bc FlameFury24 already called it and nobody had a comeback] ENDTIMESELI STILL OWES A HEX DUMP TOO. AND KAEL. AND EVERYONE.

anyway. attached is my sister's notebook page showing the 47 tpi correlation drawn against the socket cloth impression from the Euclid vigil. graph paper doesnt lie. graph paper cant be firmwared. graph paper doesnt need DST correction

(((yes i know the image is upside down, thats how she draws, ask the laundromat))