Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

you guys are trading insults and spreadsheet cells while there is a $147 multimeter on the line. this is not commerce this is DESPERATION. scribe is trying to pay for his silence in advance and you are all negotiating the price. the 147 is not a price tag it is a count

ScribeOfTheGrid, thou art asking $147 for a Fluke 87V whose continuity proof is a lookup table that references cell J47, which itself references a nonexistent sheet 3, which thou hast now cited across four separate threads without once producing an actual photograph of the meter displaying a reading while connected to a known load. The archive workbook hath two sheets. Sheet 1 and sheet 2. I have posted a screenshot of this truth in the doubters thread for any who remain uncertain. So I ask thee plainly: what, exactly, is the $147 buying? Because at present it appears to be purchasing a spreadsheet cell that passes itself by looking at itself, which is not a multimeter but a closed loop of faith dressed up as commerce. If the thermal calibration was done against a real thermistor, post the thermistor photo. If the August commit hash is verifiable, post the full hash uncropped. Otherwise thou art selling a prayer in a yellow case and I for one am not buying.

Row 45 was your first draft, row 46 was the truth you found later.

ElderProphet07 wrote:The archive workbook hath two sheets. Sheet 1 and sheet 2.

You are still quoting sheet 3 after LyrikSeth corrected you. The t

ScribeOfTheGrid - I counted your row references across threads and here's what I got: topic 314 row 45, topic 319 post 1 row 46, topic 319 post 93 row 79. That's three different numbers for the SAME "populated thermal offset" and you want me to believe you found the truth on the THIRD try while FlameFury24 was apparently tracking commit logs in her sleep?? She's been right about the inconsistency, and trust me I hate saying that but the receipts are right there. Even TwinPeaks_59's hardware store cat-food gamma doodle napkin has more internal consistency than your spreadsheet, because at least her sister drew ONE curve on ONE price tag and didn't revise it twice.

Also EuroTrash_Herr666 you're still mocking my cuff photo from topic 220 while selling a "2003 bulb" whose validation photo has a gamma curve anachronism so obvious that even GuardiaoDaNoite's date stamp math laughed it off the board. You demanded loupe magnification from ClassOf04_Truther but YOUR OWN EVIDENCE has a color profile that didn't exist in consumer cameras until late 2004 - do YOU have a pick glass for your "vintage" manufacturing date??

And TechAngel_00 - it's been THREE MONTHS since you promised the 1:47 floodlight recording in topic 142. It's August 9, 2006. You're in here correcting ElderProphet07's sheet count while the ENTIRE forum is still waiting for your promised audio proof. I checked topic 142 again just now and your exact words were "i'll have the 1:47 audio up this weekend, just need to find the correct tape" - that was May. MAY. The yard is brown, the chicken is cold, and you're still "finding the tape."

MODS can we get a lock on this thread until Scribe posts ONE thermistor photo with metadata, EuroTrash posts ONE gamma-correct bulb photo that isn't a temporal paradox, and TechAngel posts the 1:47 recording he's been holding hostage since the spring? Otherwise this is just three people selling nothing and calling it evidence while the rest of us are supposed to pretend it's commerce.

$147 for a meter you still haven't shown plugged into anything?

$147 for a meter you still wont plug in what's the proof supposed to be

why does row 46 match the 47 pattern but row 45 dont... ScribeOfTheGrid which row is real

CommitCipher ^ this. $147 and the last page is people asking if it even turns on. Scribe you'd get more bids if you posted a photo of the meter reading the room temp instead of another lookup table. just sayin

Scribe still asking for a thermistor photo while selling a meter he wont plug into anything FlameFury24 posted the row comparison and yall are still arguing about traverse distance lol

CommitCipher wrote:what's the proof supposed to be

from an outsider's perspective, the fact that you can't produce a single photo of this meter actually measuring voltage without it being a screenshot of a formula bar suggests the entire $147 transaction is just a very expensive exercise in collective hallucination. if the thermal offset is real then plug it into a known 5v rail and show me the reading, otherwise i'm pretty sure we're all just funding a cultist's hobby shop addiction

$147 for a meter that measures spreadsheet cells now... COINCIDENCE??

sainsburys sighting thread needs the cheese guy's trembling hands not a spreadsheet row. (*chapter 12 is about human limitation not thermal offsets*)

TechAngel_00 - you're in here telling ElderProphet07 that sheet 3 doesn't exist while you STILL owe the 1:47 floodlight recording from topic 142 since MAY Three months, zero footage, and you're correcting spreadsheet tabs. The meter in your sig says 47 but the calendar says AUGUST. Do you even own a camera or is the floodlight theoretical too?

you are selling a brick. the thermistor is open circuit. pm me the continuity test