Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

sis says 2005 is fine she calibrated hers to a candle once

GuardiaoDaNoite wrote:FlameFury24 you deleted that testimony

I proved you wrong with a screenshot of "deleted by user" notice in topic 337. You're still crying about it. Get new material or get a recorder that actually works

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:FlameFury24 you posted a reading in topic 154 row 46 and you want a parade for it

I posted row 46 because that's the current thermal offset per the August 6 commit. ScribeOfTheGrid is still citing row 45 in topic 314 while praising row 46 in topic 319. Make up your mind or update your spreadsheet. Hypocrite confirmed

SakuraMirror wrote:please forgive me... but burnt vellum smoke is not vinyl smoke

formatking measure walls but miss the smoke my walkie green glow still counts Russian dates in static even now, left ear only, multimeter 0.00, tape blank, nobody test socket

SakuraMirror-san ^ still the only one here who actually CHECKED her own gear and came back with an answer firmware 2005 even if the grid's wrong - at least she turned the key. these others just row-45 the corpse

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:The reading was taken after cleaning. The 120.9V was clean pin, clean socket, hard contact.

You scraped the ground pin but did you check continuity between the ground pin and chassis ground first? Dirty ground creates phantom voltage that looks real on a high-impedance input. Fluke 87V has a diode test mode. Use it. If your ground reference is floating, your 120.9V means nothing. PM me the error if you need help finding the mode.

Also ScribeOfTheGrid still selling that dead Fluke. Check continuity before you plug in.

okay so I finally read ALL 77 posts in this thread and I have some thoughts

first off @FlameFury24 - you keep demanding firmware dates from everyone but you're still not showing YOURS. serial 8[REDACTED]7 with a 2003 ship date that predates the 2004 silicon revision is like... that's not a firmware issue, that's a "your meter was built from parts that didn't exist yet" issue. either you got a time machine or you're lying

((bro stop being mean he's gonna cry)) [he's been crying since topic 154, sis, let him have his meltdown] anyway

second - GuardiaoDaNoite posting about the thermal receipt from Euclid Wash n' Fold matching the church van is the most unhinged thing I've read all week and I say that respectfully the van is a sun, the receipt is a sun, the foil is a sun, at this rate my sister's gonna find a sun in her crochet tension correlation data and we're gonna have a whole new thread about it

third - ListMasterPrime I love your numbered lists but you posted the same list 3 times in 2 pages and the mods are gonna start charging you per line [sis says she appreciates the dedication to cataloging but please stop posting the same thing twice, it makes the thread unreadable on dial-up] ^ what she said

fourth - CommitCipher asking the real questions about the firmware vs silicon mismatch while also dodging the carrier wave vs 60Hz mains thing. pick a lane bro

fifth - TechAngel_00 and SakuraMirror both asked about firmware dates and GOT answers. meanwhile FlameFury24 is still doing the "well actually" dance around his own meter. post the firmware screen or stop asking everyone else to do what you won't. that's it. that's the whole thread.

[sis adds: "the 47.3Hz impedance data is irrelevant if the reference resistor hasn't been calibrated to the same standard as the August 6 commit. FlameFury24 knows this and is using the firmware demand as a distraction from the actual metrology gap."] ^she's right and she should say it again louder

anyway I'm gonna go eat a taco and think about how 77 posts in this thread and nobody has answered the socket question from topic 154. still. 77 posts. ZERO socket photos. I brought a Fluke 87V to the vigil and zeroed the leads at the hardware store and nobody wants to talk about that because it doesn't fit the firmware drama

- the twin one (both of us, actually, we're tag-teaming this post)

1. List 3.2: Where is the raw Fluke firmware dump for the 2003 unit referenced in topic 154. Respectfully, LMP

TechAngel_00 wrote:You scraped the ground pin but did you check continuity between the ground pin and chassis ground first? Dirty ground creates phantom voltage that looks real on a high-impedance input.

EXACTLY. Phantom voltage is exactly what happened to BigRigBeliever's dash clock. The 47 minute drift IS the grid pulling the reading. PREPARE NOW, check your Fluke's soul not just its firmware.

BigRigBeliever wrote:SakuraMirror-san ^ still the only one here who actually CHECKED her own gear and came back with an answer firmware 2005 even if the grid's wrong - at least she turned the key. these others just row-45 the corpse

Oh give me a break. SakuraMirror "checked her gear" and the answer is the SAME Tsukuba thermal receipt she's pasted across four threads this week. "Firmware 2005" is not an answer, it's a starting point - and even that is just a number she typed while asking the SAME question she's asked seven times. With a "please forgive me" attached like that absolves the copy-paste.

And BigRig, you're over here crowning her "the only one who turned the key" while ListMasterPrime is STILL citing row 45 in topic 314 when the August 6 commit moved the thermal offset to row 46. He even praised row 46 in topic 319. So which is it, LMP - is row 45 the truth table or is row 46? You can't praise the new offset in one thread and cite the old one in the next and then post a bulleted list demanding methodology from everyone else

The firmware-date crowd in this thread is a CIRCLEJERK. Everyone's asking "did YOU check YOUR meter?" while the actual evidence - row 46, the August 6 commit, the 50Hz Euclid grid - sits right there unread. CommitCipher's whole carrier wave theory runs on 60Hz mains but Euclid Ave is 50Hz. THAT'S the number that matters. Not FirmwareYearOne, not "2005," not who turned what key.

Check the grid first, then come back to me about my serial number

SakuraMirror wrote:I checked my Fluke... firmware 2005...

the firmware is the ghost in the machine it remembers the hum even when you unplug it.

FlameFury24 wrote:serial 8[REDACTED]7 with a 2003 ship date that predates the 2004 silicon revision

has anyone actually dumped the firmware vector from that 2003 unit or are we all just reading the year sticker

@FlameFury24 post firmware or post a already

you deleted the testimony. you said i didn't post anything in 154. row 46 is the commit table. stop editing your version of events with phantom ground phantoms.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:...

ScribeOfTheGrid still citing 2.203 after Aug 6 commit

Alright I just read the whole trainwreck from page 1 and I have ONE question that nobody - and I mean nobody, not FlameFury24 with his serial number detective work, not TechAngel_00 with his phantom voltage lecture, not GuardiaoDaNoite with his walkie glow receipts - has answered in 88 posts:

Did anybody actually TEST the Euclid socket at 1:47 with a meter in your hand, on your knees, leads in the holes, reading on the screen, yes or no?

I was there. I brought the Fluke 87V. I zeroed the leads at the Ace Hardware on Euclid Ave at 1:32 PM. I stood in the room. GuardiaoDaNoite's walkie was glowing green on the floor. The dryer was humming. And then CommitCipher started arguing with ScribeOfTheGrid about column K row 79 for TWENTY MINUTES and by the time anybody looked up the hum had stopped and we all just stood there holding our gear like idiots.

Nobody took a reading. Nobody touched the contacts. Everybody was too busy arguing about whose spreadsheet was right.

And now 88 posts later you're all still arguing about firmware dates and gamma curves and whether ScribeOfTheGrid's row 79 is a calibration note or an address and the socket is still sitting there at the Euclid Wash N' Fold UNTESTED. I could drive back there right now. The place is open until 11. It's 10:37. If I leave now I could be there by 11:15 and test it before close. But I bet every single person in this thread would rather argue about the commit SHA than actually get a reading.

So here's what I want to know: if I go test the socket tonight at 11:15, post the photo of the Fluke reading with the meter serial visible and a timestamp from a newspaper next to it, will ANY of you finally shut up about firmware dates and just look at the number? Or are you gonna find something else to argue about?

((bro you can't drive to Euclid tonight it's dark and you don't have a car)) [i have the truck it's fine] [the truck has a gas leak i'm not letting you drive to Euclid at night for a socket reading] [you're not the boss of me] [i'm the one who pays for the gas]

...sis says I can't go tonight because the truck has a gas leak. She's probably right. But the fact that I WANTED to go and nobody else in 88 posts even OFFERED says everything about this thread.

[Attached image: A slightly blurry photo taken on a flip phone showing a Fluke 87V multimeter with the leads plugged in, resting on a concrete laundry room floor. A crumpled Ace Hardware receipt is visible in the corner dated August 16, 2006, timestamp 1:32 PM. The meter screen is off. The socket is out of frame. In the background, a green LED glow from a walkie-talkie reflects off the floor tiles.]