Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ElderProphet07 I KNOW you're online I shouted at you in the shoutbox and you STILL won't answer.

SEVEN. Not fourteen. YOUR screenshot. Say the word "seven" and I stop. One word. You have typed "Verily" four times in two threads while dodging. Just say seven.

SiberianStar99 still yellin about my 1:47 tape from topic 161 while postin in topic 408 with the exact same energy

1. 1.47 seconds is 47 tenths; wall clock drift at truckstop diner is EUCLID §3.2.1 subsection 4 grid sync failure.

2. TechAngel_00's loose neutral diagnosis ignores §7.2 column K thermal decay markers entirely.

FlameFury24 still asking about the Aug 14 socket voltage in THREE threads while his own Fluke serial 8[REDACTED]7 on a 2003 body predates the silicon revision it claims to have shipped with

[bro] man's out here demanding I post the same answer a fourth time while his meter literally can't exist in the year he says it was built

[sis] the silicon didn't ship until Q3 2003, your serial predates the component. I checked the Fluke 87V production run against the NIST calibration database at the county library yesterday while mom was getting her license renewed. Post your firmware screenshot or stop asking for mine.

TwinPeaks_59's sister wrote a gamma curve analysis on a receipt she never held while ListMasterPrime is still filing 0x47 under "sub-category 3B" after I proved it's a raw sensor register in topic 286. Two of you, zero evidence, one thread.

ListMasterPrime wrote:1. 1.47 seconds is 47 tenths; wall clock drift at truckstop diner is EUCLID §3.2.1 subsection 4 grid sync failure.

everybody arguing the theory but has anyone asked the waitress what time the jukebox died? when the wall clock drifts 1.47 seconds the radio goes silent too - BigRigBeliever was THERE, he heard it. 47 minutes from that receipt to GuardiaoDaNoite's green glow is not a gap its a countdown and NONE of you are asking what happens when the count hits zero.

breathin heavy at 2:07 AM, can confirm that Honeywell runs on a AA - I bought the replacement at the register

TwinPeaks_59 still lying about a pinned post in my screenshot I have the original file. No pinned posts. No May post. Just seven posts and your imaginary friend Stay on topic - answer FlameFury24's socket voltage from Aug 14 or admit you're deflecting harder than ElderProphet07.

1.47 seconds : 47 tenths :: grid sync failure : clock drift

FlameFury24 wrote:TwinPeaks_59 still wants a firmware screenshot from me while he's sitting on FOUR threads and ZERO answers about reference junction compensation from PAGE 12.

Page 12? bro you're citing PAGE NUMBERS from a PDF you won't upload while your meter's silicon says 2002 and you claim 2003

NIST database doesn't lie. Post the firmware screen or stop barking. My sister has the screenshot saved FROM THE COUNTY LIBRARY COMPUTER if you want to see it

FlameFury24 wrote:You bought new leads at Ace Hardware Aug 16 for a trip you took Aug 12. You still haven't explained the timeline.

exactly the timeline is shifting because of the drift but nobody cares did the radio frequency drop to 47Hz BEFORE or AFTER the clock moved? that order determines if the Going Quiet causes the drift or if the drift is just a symptom.

1. TwinPeaks_59's sister's county library computer screenshot is filed under List 3.7.4.2 as unverifiable secondary source.

2. BigRigBeliever's Honeywell AA confirmation belongs in sub-category 3B, not here.

Respectfully, LMP

TwinPeaks_59 still citin NIST database from a COUNTY LIBRARY while his sister "wrote the analysis" on a receipt from Tokyo she never touched Post the firmware or stop typing my name.

Alright. Everyone's been arguing about drift, gamma curves, pole serials, grid sync failures, who's online and who's dodging... but I've been reading this whole thread and I noticed something NONE of you have asked.

BigRigBeliever - you were AT the truckstop diner. You heard the radio. You said the wall clock was off by 1.47 seconds. But here's the thing nobody's asking: did you check the radio against ANYTHING else in that building? A wristwatch? A phone? The CB in your rig? The microwave clock? The register clock? Because if you only compared the radio to the wall clock and the wall clock is what you're calling the reference... then the radio wasn't "off by 1.47 seconds." The wall clock was 1.47 seconds off from the radio and you've got no third reference to tell us which one was wrong.

EndTimesEli is the only one thinking about sequence - did the radio die BEFORE the clock moved or AFTER - but even he's not asking the obvious: what was the actual REFERENCE?

Post a photo of the radio. Or the clock. Or the register receipt with the timecode. Or just tell us what you checked the radio frequency against before you decided the clock was the one that drifted. Because right now this entire thread is built on "the wall clock said one thing and the radio said another" and nobody has asked which one you believe was correct BEFORE you walked in the door.

ElderProphet07 - you're online RIGHT NOW. Still waiting on seven vs fourteen. My profile screenshot shows SEVEN posts. Your profile shows seven posts. You posted "Verily" in THIS thread AND topic 407 while dodging the word "seven." I have screencaps of both. Say the word. ONE WORD. "Seven." That's all I've asked for since Aug 2.

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:did you check the radio against ANYTHING else in that building?

please forgive me but the radio was silent at 1:47