Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

EndTimesEli keep sayin the Going Quiet don't need no multimeter but you never explain HOW the 0x47 null in the FRAM dump connects to a dead walkie battery in Siberia. is it the same null or is it a different null

cuz i got a CB that lights up with no battery and i been trackin that same green glow across three states now and i can tell ya - the null in my cab at 1:47 don't sound like the null yall keep arguin about on paper. sound like a VOICE waitin to finish a word

still not buying it. what is the proof supposed to be

3:47 am and breaker still off? that's how you get a neck that vibrates in time with the smoke.

TechAngel_00 which probe model and what is the compensation square frequency setting

EndTimesEli still not buyin' it? what's the proof supposed to BE then

BackAgainLikeBadHair you have the actual nerve to pop in here demanding MY socket photo from topic 154 when you are STILL the only person on this entire board who has managed to ghost-edit bulb listings at 3am without ever once explaining who does the ghost editing when your only computer is the family Dell that your sister has to share with you because your washer is dead and your grandma's VHS player ate the blue tape. Every single thread you come into, you wave the "nobody posted proof" flag like it's a constitution, and then you bring the exact same nothing you accuse everyone else of. Where is the 16awg cord photo you promised in topic 209? Where is the socket measurement you said you'd take at the FIRST vigil back in June? You keep asking me for a photo of a socket I was standing next to while you catalogued bulb firmware on a spreadsheet, and I posted a hardware store picture with a Fluke and a gamma curve price tag that you STILL haven't acknowledged because acknowledging it would mean you have to stop the circular firing squad for five seconds.

And CommitCipher. You want a model number? Rigol DS1054Z at 1GSa/s, battery powered through the inverter, probe compensation square set at 1kHz, and I'll bring my own leads because yours are clearly glued to a keyboard since you keep asking questions you already answered. But before you get your Rigol out of the garage, how about you do the thing you've been threatening to do since April and post the actual raw hex dump from the VU meter thread. The one you promised. The one BackAgainLikeBadHair has asked you for five times and you keep dodging by demanding OTHER people's oscilloscopes. You want everyone ELSE to calibrate their probes while you calibrate nothing and post nothing and accuse GuardiaoDaNoite of sloppy math you borrowed his numbers from in topic 287 in the first place. You are the pot calling the kettle a dead multimeter.

And you know what else while I'm here, because clearly nobody on this board can stay in one thread long enough to remember what they said in the last one - BigRigBeliever you mocked my logbook thickness and my skull in topic 301 and then agreed with me on the 16awg cord in topic 305, pick a lane, and FlameFury24 you have quoted me four separate times and every single quote has been from a version of my post you imagined instead of the one I wrote, and FormatKing__88 you policed my formatting in topic 290 while using the wrong hex code in your own signature. This whole board is a hall of mirrors where everyone is pointing at the socket and nobody is holding the Fluke, and I am the only one who actually brought hardware and actually stood in the lot and actually walked away with a number instead of a story, and I am TIRED of being the bad guy for being the only one who showed up.

((sis: lower your voice, you sound insane))

(j: I sound like everyone else on this board!)

MODS - lock this thread until someone posts an actual socket reading. I will not be coming back to the Euclid vigil to watch the same eight people argue about probe compensation while the 16awg cord sits unvolunteered in someone's garage. The failure was never the theory. The failure is that nobody volunteered the cord.

TechAngel_00 which probe model and what is the compensation square frequency setting

BigRigBeliever your CB light is proof the signal is WAKING UP. 1:47 green glow + voice waiting = the Going Quiet is real. PREPARE NOW

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:BackAgainLikeBadHair you have the actual nerve to pop in here demanding MY socket photo from topic 154 when you are STILL the only person on this entire board who has managed to ghost-edit bulb listings at 3am without ever once explaining who does the ghost editing when your only computer is the family Dell that your sister has to share with you

OHHHHHHHH OKAY SO WE'RE DOING THIS NOW. TwinPeaks_59, you want to talk about MY computer situation?? First of all - the family Dell is a Pentium 4 with 512MB of RAM and it runs circles around whatever you're using considering you TOLD ListMasterPrime in topic 287 that you had to 'borrow your cousin's laptop to check the forum' because YOURS was in the shop getting a virus removed from a LimeWire download of a Gabriel song that YOU posted about in the testimonies board as 'a sign from the commit'

Second - I didn't ghost-edit ANYTHING. The bulb listing I 'changed' was a listing I FOUND where the gamma curve was from 2003 and the claimed date was 2005, and I EDITED THE POST to add a note about the discrepancy because I was trying to DOCUMENT evidence, not HIDE it. Unlike SOME people who edit their listings at 3am to change 'used two nights' to 'never used' while leaving the gamma curve anachronism completely intact. You know who does that? Someone who got caught lying about a bulb and tried to paper over it.

And the socket photo from topic 154?? You said in MAY you'd post it. I asked you in topic 280 on AUGUST 9. It's AUGUST 11. You have had TWO DAYS since I last asked and you're STILL deflecting by writing paragraphs about my family's computer hardware?? The photo shows a socket that you stood NEXT TO with a Fluke in your hand and you CAN'T take a picture of it?? You have a camera phone, you posted a photo of a gamma curve price tag from the hardware store in topic 209, but you CAN'T take a picture of the actual socket you claim to have been standing next to??

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:you posted a hardware store picture with a Fluke and a gamma curve price tag that you STILL haven't acknowledged

I didn't acknowledge it because IT WAS A PHOTO OF A PRICE TAG. You took a picture of a PRICE TAG next to a Fluke in a box. That's not a socket measurement, that's a SHOPPING RECEIPT. You want me to acknowledge that you went to a hardware store? OKAY, I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU WENT TO A HARDWARE STORE. You spent money on a Fluke and then STOOD NEXT TO A SOCKET WITHOUT TOUCHING IT. The price tag photo proves you BOUGHT the meter. It does NOT prove you USED it.

And TechAngel_00 - you're in here asking ME to post an oscilloscope trace? YOU still owe the 1:47 floodlight recording from topic 142. Promised in MAY. It's AUGUST. You told me to post a trace while DELIVERING NOTHING YOURSELF and somehow THAT is the post that got THREE rep points from people who apparently forgot that you've been promising the same video for a quarter of a year. THREE rep points for telling someone else to do the work you haven't done. This board is a masterpiece of inverted accountability and I am honestly here for the theater at this point

BigRigBeliever - your CB photos are the only real evidence in this entire vigil thread and I say that as someone who has NEVER agreed with you about anything. Your odometer at 147k WITH the dash clock at 1:47 is more documentation than everyone else in this thread combined has produced since the first vigil. I hate that I'm saying this but thank you for actually showing up with a photo of something real.

EndTimesEli - 'the cat knows 0x47' is the funniest thing you've ever posted and I want you to know I laughed out loud at work and had to tell Denise I was looking at something about my grandmother's cat. So thanks for that. Still wrong about the 0x47 null being a fingerprint, but funny.

CommitCipher - you asked for a model number and got one. Now answer the question YOU still owe: what sampling rate did you use for the spectrogram that allegedly shows 71.33 Hz? Because GuardiaoDaNoite posted his methodology and YOU didn't.

Anyway. I'll be at Euclid on Aug 12 at 1:47 AM with a Fluke 87V that I will actually USE to measure the socket. If anyone wants to meet me there, bring something that does more than stand next to things.

Euclid Ave is 50Hz, fellas. CommitCipher's whole carrier wave runs on 60. Get rekt.

TechAngel_00 wrote:Rigol DS1054Z. 50MHz. 1GSa/s. It's battery powered via the AC adapter or I'll bring a small UPS for the inverter. Don't show up with that Fluke 87V and expect to see the third harmonic at 71.33Hz. You need the scope. Bring it compensated. Check the probe calibration square before you leave the house.

from an objective standpoint, i have to ask a question nobody seems willing to answer: where exactly are you planning to plug this Rigol in? we're talking about measuring a socket that is supposed to be dead - breaker off, zero potential, the whole shebang. if the circuit is truly de-energized as per the vigil protocol, then your 50MHz scope has absolutely no power source unless someone is running extension cords from a living room outlet three rooms away. which brings me to the actual problem here - if you're drawing mains power through an inverter to run measurement equipment on a supposedly "dead" circuit, aren't you just introducing massive ground loop noise and common-mode interference into your own readings?

i've read the thread thirty times now and nobody has explained how you intend to power high-impedance probe inputs without creating a reference path that completely invalidates whatever voltage differential you're trying to measure. basic electrical engineering says you can't measure floating potential without completing a circuit, but somehow everyone here thinks Gabriel-sama's silence creates a virtual ground that doesn't obey Ohm's law.

and seriously, does anyone actually know what building this is happening in? because if it's a residential structure built before 1980, the wiring might not even have a proper ground wire. so your scope's safety earth would be floating anyway, which means any "readings" you capture are just picking up RF from the neighbor's microwave or whatever else is in the area.

just wondering if anyone has considered that maybe the hum isn't there because Gabriel-sama is quiet, but because the circuit is genuinely open and your equipment is just oscillating due to lack of a reference point. from my perspective as someone who has actually studied instrumentation, this whole setup sounds like it's designed to produce data rather than measure anything real.

OH LOOK, BigRigBeliever posted ANOTHER CB glow photo with no clock visible this time. Real convenient how the dash clock was visible in the FIRST photo but somehow it's OUT OF FRAME in the SECOND one when people started asking if the AM/PM matched the Euclid window.

I'm not saying you faked the first photo. I'm saying you deliberately cropped the second one so we couldn't cross-reference the time against the transmit light duration. 47 seconds at 1:47 is a specific claim. Now show us the CLOCK.

LurkingObserver42 wrote:from an objective standpoint, i have to ask a question nobody seems willing to answer: where exactly are you planning to plug this Rigol in?

^ THIS. Actual engineering question that TechAngel_00 has been DODGING since he posted the Rigol model number. You're gonna bring a scope to a DEAD CIRCUIT. The whole POINT of the Euclid vigil is to measure the socket when the breaker is OFF. So what powers the scope? A battery? Fine. For how long? A UPS through an inverter? Great, now you've got a ground loop that will inject MORE noise than the "dead" socket is supposed to emit.

TechAngel_00 wrote four paragraphs about probe compensation in topic 154 but can't answer ONE SENTENCE about the power source.

And speaking of things nobody answers - GuardiaoDaNoite. You've been posting green glow walkie talkie photos in EVERY THREAD for TWO MONTHS and you STILL haven't answered the resistance question. What's the DC resistance across the battery terminals when the walkie is OFF? What's the voltage between the antenna and ground? You keep saying "abuela voice in left ear" like that's data. It's not data. It's a story. Post the measurement or stop posting the glow.

SundayFarewell asked you for an actual resistance measurement in topic 280 and you posted a spectrogram of "glow noise" instead.

CharcoalSoul_88 wrote:3:47 am and breaker still off? that's how you get a neck that vibrates in time with the smoke.

CharcoalSoul_88 I swear if you post about your neck vibrating ONE MORE TIME without a calibrated accelerometer reading I'm going to request a mod lock this thread just on principle. You burned kozo vellum, your neck vibrated, the wall "felt different." GREAT. Where's the data?? Where's the frequency plot?? Where's the BEFORE reading with the breaker ON so we can compare?

Euclid Vigil #2 is supposed to be the one where we ACTUALLY MEASURE SOMETHING and instead we've got 56 posts of people arguing about who ghost-edited a bulb listing at 3am.

FlameFury24 wrote:So either you pulled it out of the air or you measured it. Which is it? Pick one theological lane and stay in it.

FLAMEFURY.

I have been biting my tongue for THREE threads now but you are making it impossible. You sit there in every single thread demanding proofs and measurements and hex dumps from everyone else while YOU contribute absolutely NOTHING but sarcastic smileys and goalpost moving

You did it in the Euclid Vigil thread. You did it in the 7-Eleven thread. You did it in the laundromat thread just now. Every time someone posts a reading you scream WHERE'S THE CALIBRATION and every time someone posts a testimony you scream THAT'S NOT DATA. You are the reason we are STILL arguing about methodology while the Going Quiet creeps closer every single night

TechAngel_00 posts a Fluke reading of 47.0 Hz and your response is WHERE'S THE HEAT LAMP CABLE. BigRigBeliever posts a CB photo with a green glow at 1:47 and your response is WHERE'S THE BREAKER PANEL. The evidence is RIGHT THERE. The 1:47 timestamp. The 47Hz. The green glow. These things are CONNECTED and you keep dragging every thread into the weeds asking for cable management photos like this is a home inspection

FlameFury24 wrote:Get rekt

NO U. You have been "just asking questions" since JUNE. That is not skepticism. That is obstruction. ElderProphet07 sees it. I see it. BigRigBeliever sees it. The only person who doesn't see it is YOU because you are too busy writing paragraphs about where the power cable is while the grid goes dark around you

THE SIGNS ARE THERE. 1:47. 47Hz. Green glow. The commute, the breaker, the hum, the pattern. It has been documented across FOURTEEN threads by at least SIX different people and you are STILL sitting there going "but where's the calibration." THE CALIBRATION IS THE PATTERN ITSELF

I am done being polite. Either you are deliberately trying to slow this community down or you genuinely cannot see what is happening. Either way you are a liability to the Vigil and I am putting this on the record right now so that when the Going Quiet hits and people look back at who was helping and who was hindering, your name will be right there in the archive next to a big pile of and WHERE'S THE CABLE.

PREPARE NOW or get out of the way

TwinPeaks_59 "borrowed your cousin's laptop" LimeWire infection is not a rig spec

^ EndTimesEli. Preach it brother. You been sayin what I been sayin - FlameFury24 wants a clock and a breaker panel and a birth certificate on every photo but never once rolled down his window at 1:47 to hear if the hum was breathin. The CB glow dont lie. The 47 dont lie. You want proof? Park your rig at a dead weigh station with no battery power and watch the dial light up green at the exact same minute the commits go quiet. Then come talk to me about methodology.